Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer's O-line is one player away.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 270715" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>That's precisely what I think. It's mcuh easier to adress the LG position this year, and we have a bigger hole there this season that at the LT spot.</p><p></p><p>I don't agree, however, with what you said about the draft. I do agree that they see Colledge with better eyes than we do, But I doubt they'll evaluate him as a competent starter. (but after they re-signed Bush, I don't doubt anything). And I think they have Tauscher, Lang and Grant at much higher status than they have Colledge.</p><p></p><p>I think TT showed last year that he'll adress needs before he gets the BPA, as long as the players aren't too far between.</p><p></p><p>If he has a shot at Spiller, that'll be the pick hands down. It's just too much higher stock than any other option. And it is a sort of a need.</p><p></p><p>But when looking at Best, Iupati or the Tackles I mentioned, maybe Best will be higher on his list, but not much than Iupati, if any. Packers' personel have already contacted Iupati, IN THE FIRST DAY OF SENIOR BOWL PRACTICE.</p><p></p><p>And Iupati will be higher than the Tackles.</p><p></p><p>So, when balancing things out, I'd bet that TT makes the same move he did with Raji and Crabtree. Crabtree was reportedly his #1 on the board, but Raji wasn't very far. As DT was a much bigger need than WR, he was taken.</p><p></p><p>I see something like this:</p><p></p><p>Spiller - 5</p><p>Best - 20</p><p>Iupati - 22</p><p>Bulaga - 26</p><p>Williams - 27</p><p></p><p>Actually, I see Iupati higher in TT's board than Best, but if by any chance Best is higher, it won't be by much. As OL will be a higher need than RB, I believe Iupati ultimately will be the pick.</p><p></p><p>Of course, everything said here is highly hypotetical. We're too far from the Draft. Stocks could be highly altered, FAs could be or not be available. Trades could happen...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 270715, member: 1429"] That's precisely what I think. It's mcuh easier to adress the LG position this year, and we have a bigger hole there this season that at the LT spot. I don't agree, however, with what you said about the draft. I do agree that they see Colledge with better eyes than we do, But I doubt they'll evaluate him as a competent starter. (but after they re-signed Bush, I don't doubt anything). And I think they have Tauscher, Lang and Grant at much higher status than they have Colledge. I think TT showed last year that he'll adress needs before he gets the BPA, as long as the players aren't too far between. If he has a shot at Spiller, that'll be the pick hands down. It's just too much higher stock than any other option. And it is a sort of a need. But when looking at Best, Iupati or the Tackles I mentioned, maybe Best will be higher on his list, but not much than Iupati, if any. Packers' personel have already contacted Iupati, IN THE FIRST DAY OF SENIOR BOWL PRACTICE. And Iupati will be higher than the Tackles. So, when balancing things out, I'd bet that TT makes the same move he did with Raji and Crabtree. Crabtree was reportedly his #1 on the board, but Raji wasn't very far. As DT was a much bigger need than WR, he was taken. I see something like this: Spiller - 5 Best - 20 Iupati - 22 Bulaga - 26 Williams - 27 Actually, I see Iupati higher in TT's board than Best, but if by any chance Best is higher, it won't be by much. As OL will be a higher need than RB, I believe Iupati ultimately will be the pick. Of course, everything said here is highly hypotetical. We're too far from the Draft. Stocks could be highly altered, FAs could be or not be available. Trades could happen... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer's O-line is one player away.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
