Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers must keep 6 Wr on the 53
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RRyder" data-source="post: 611729" data-attributes="member: 10329"><p>They're keeping 3 QBs unless Hundley completely outplays Tolzien. They wont cut Hundley period. He's on the 53. They traded up to get him and he has about the same chance as I have of hitting the powerball as he does clearin waivers for the PS.</p><p></p><p>Unless Kuhn falls off a cliff smart moneys on Ripkowski hitting the PS. Hard to see a team going to the back of the line on waivers for a FB. He seems destined to spend his rookie year on the PS.</p><p></p><p>But yes I could definatley see them only keepin 5 WRs. I could also see them listing Montgomery as the #3RB also to make room for anyone that steps up In camp but then again im not high on him as a WR.</p><p></p><p>Coxson is hitting the PS though. I'd put money on that. Keeping 6 WRs really depenx on BOTH Janis and Abbredariss having strong showings in camp otherwise if only one shines or niether do then it'll be 5 with the number five being White. As stated earlier that extra roster spot will be used at QB.</p><p></p><p>Still though. I dont understand how people can think we're deep at WR. Great at #s1-3 yes. After that we have exactly zero guys who have done anything of note at the pro level</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RRyder, post: 611729, member: 10329"] They're keeping 3 QBs unless Hundley completely outplays Tolzien. They wont cut Hundley period. He's on the 53. They traded up to get him and he has about the same chance as I have of hitting the powerball as he does clearin waivers for the PS. Unless Kuhn falls off a cliff smart moneys on Ripkowski hitting the PS. Hard to see a team going to the back of the line on waivers for a FB. He seems destined to spend his rookie year on the PS. But yes I could definatley see them only keepin 5 WRs. I could also see them listing Montgomery as the #3RB also to make room for anyone that steps up In camp but then again im not high on him as a WR. Coxson is hitting the PS though. I'd put money on that. Keeping 6 WRs really depenx on BOTH Janis and Abbredariss having strong showings in camp otherwise if only one shines or niether do then it'll be 5 with the number five being White. As stated earlier that extra roster spot will be used at QB. Still though. I dont understand how people can think we're deep at WR. Great at #s1-3 yes. After that we have exactly zero guys who have done anything of note at the pro level [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Zartan
Cans.wav
Members online
tynimiller
Schultz
GreenBaySlacker
Azpackfan4
ExpatPacker
weeds
scheeler
PikeBadger
txj
coulomb
Fat Dogs
Zartan
gatorpack
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: tynimiller
A moment ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: PikeBadger
Today at 1:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers must keep 6 Wr on the 53
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top