Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 459934" data-attributes="member: 2846">Now that is thinking out of the box. To those who are criticizing the whole topic . . . I said in the OP it won't happen and that one of the main reasons was to improve my fantasy team. So this is entirely hypothetical. And if you don't like to think in hypotheticals, that's sad. Can you imagine a world with no hypothetical situations? Now regarding trading of Jennings: POSITIVESThe decrease in talent from the WRs without Jennings is much less than the increase in talent at RB if we add MJD.  Think if we had Jennings and MJD on the roster right now and we had to loose one. It would be Jennings.  We would be posting - hey we have lots of receivers who are pretty good right now. NEGATIVESMJD is a malcontent and I could be an issue.We would lose a very strong locker room guy in Jennings, a leader. Would I do the trade? Nope. If MJD was an Huge Packer fan and would play for us cheap - I would consider it. As I think about this now, MJD is looking at about 10M per year and that is about what it will take to sign Jennings long term. In the end, I would want to maintain my team chemistry and I don't make the trade.  If the last few teams to win the SB did not have a great RB that is an interesting statistic. But to draw the conclusion that having a great RB is somehow a detriment, is a mistake.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 777 (members: 2, guests: 775)