Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers have slowest receiving corps in the NFL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 633681" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I agree with you in the fact that having speed as a WR helps and could help the Packers stretch the field. However, IMO Rob Demovsky really dumbs things down in this article in an attempt to explain the woes of the Packers offense. I get it, we all are guilty of saying "ah haaa, I discovered the problem!" But we aren't reporters, getting paid to analyze the Packers. I just don't see the merits of using the average 40 times of all the starting WR's on a team and come to the conclusion that he did. First, if you look at his chart and then compare it to the current Stat of Total Passing Yards by team, there is no correlation . Finally, if we sat Jones and Adams and replaced them with Janis and Abby, by his "formula", we should be a lot better? To me the "40 time" is just one of many tools to evaluate talent, but he is really watering it's value down in the way he is using it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 633681, member: 7261"] I agree with you in the fact that having speed as a WR helps and could help the Packers stretch the field. However, IMO Rob Demovsky really dumbs things down in this article in an attempt to explain the woes of the Packers offense. I get it, we all are guilty of saying "ah haaa, I discovered the problem!" But we aren't reporters, getting paid to analyze the Packers. I just don't see the merits of using the average 40 times of all the starting WR's on a team and come to the conclusion that he did. First, if you look at his chart and then compare it to the current Stat of Total Passing Yards by team, there is no correlation . Finally, if we sat Jones and Adams and replaced them with Janis and Abby, by his "formula", we should be a lot better? To me the "40 time" is just one of many tools to evaluate talent, but he is really watering it's value down in the way he is using it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Calebs Revenge
gopkrs
El Guapo
DABIGZ
Latest posts
Away Stadium You Would Like to Visit
Latest: El Guapo
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: El Guapo
9 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
S
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: saturdaysarebetter
46 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Just found out
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 12:28 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers have slowest receiving corps in the NFL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top