Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 939754">The situations listed aren't even close to being similar though. As mentioned before in this thread, none of the teams in the examples listed had a clear starter at the point they spend a high draft pick on a replacement. In addition What's the point of bringing them up then?Of course higher picks than Love are used on quarterbacks. It absolutely makes sense when looking for a starting quarterback as a struggling franchise. It doesn't when having a HOFer coming off playing in the NFCCG though.Just to clarify once again, it's way too early to fairly evaluate Love as a player.In my opinion the Packers wasting a chance to improve the short term chances of winning the Super Bowl by using their first round on a quarterback instead of addressing a position of need was the biggest mistake.I would have been fine with spending a day three pick on a potential backup quarterback. There's absolutely no reason at all to trade up in the first round to select one though.Love becoming a decent starter down the road for the Packers is the only way that pick doesn't end up being a huge mistake.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 540 (members: 0, guests: 540)