Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Front Office Under Fire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 912147" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>who says he was "so unprepared"? or couldn't beat out Boyle? I think it's obvious Love was chosen for the long term, not the short. I don't think they wanted Love to be in the discussion for playing time until next year at the soonest. </p><p></p><p>I'd think it's at least, if not more, likely the reason Love wasn't named a back up was because they had already decided there was no benefit to putting him on the field last year for their long term plan. Sure they could have thrown him in and see what happened. My guess is that wasn't at all in their plans unless something catastrophic happened it became the only plan.</p><p></p><p>Otherwise it was always their intention to have him sit and learn and it became more so in a season when there was no opportunity to get game reps or real practice reps. They already thought Love had enough in the tank to trade up and select him in the draft. I doubt they thought, hey if Rodgers does down, lets scrap the long term plan and just toss him out there and see what he does. </p><p></p><p>It would have been concerning had they kept Boyle for THIS season rather than letting him walk.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 912147, member: 10441"] who says he was "so unprepared"? or couldn't beat out Boyle? I think it's obvious Love was chosen for the long term, not the short. I don't think they wanted Love to be in the discussion for playing time until next year at the soonest. I'd think it's at least, if not more, likely the reason Love wasn't named a back up was because they had already decided there was no benefit to putting him on the field last year for their long term plan. Sure they could have thrown him in and see what happened. My guess is that wasn't at all in their plans unless something catastrophic happened it became the only plan. Otherwise it was always their intention to have him sit and learn and it became more so in a season when there was no opportunity to get game reps or real practice reps. They already thought Love had enough in the tank to trade up and select him in the draft. I doubt they thought, hey if Rodgers does down, lets scrap the long term plan and just toss him out there and see what he does. It would have been concerning had they kept Boyle for THIS season rather than letting him walk. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
tynimiller
CarryTheG14
gopkrs
mradtke66
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:09 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 9:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Front Office Under Fire
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top