Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Front Office Under Fire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 900485"><p>I agree that Gutekunst made a mistake selecting Love in the first round last year, possibly passing on a player that could have made an impact in 2020.</p><p></p><p>But there's no reason to trade him at this point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's actually the same. The Packers weren't talented enough to be capable of winning the Super Bowl.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The interesting part about your take is that you criticize the players for not making enough plays yet in your opinion they were somehow capable of beating the Bucs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course you need to use hindsight to figure out which team was capable of winning the Super Bowl, I never mentioned anything different.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, a pole vaulter was incapable of clearing a specific height until he actually makes it for the first time.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately the Packers only get one shot per season at making the Super Bowl. They actually got two to beat the Bucs this year but who cares.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>According to the Cambridge dictionary the definition of being capable of something is as follows:</p><p></p><p><em><strong>having the ability, power or qualities to be able to do something.</strong></em></p><p></p><p>There's no mentioning of theoretically being able to do something under the assumption of different what ifs happening or whatever. It's plain and simple being able to do something.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, by definition, the Patriots weren't capable of winning the Super Bowl in 2007.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a terrible comparison as a 94% free throw shooter has proven to be capable of making it. A miss doesn't change anything about that.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately as mentioned above the Packers don't get such a margin for error though. They only have one shot at winning the Super Bowl and they didn't get it done this season, hence not being capable of.</p><p></p><p>They actually haven't been capable of even making it to the Super Bowl for 10 years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 900485"] I agree that Gutekunst made a mistake selecting Love in the first round last year, possibly passing on a player that could have made an impact in 2020. But there's no reason to trade him at this point. That's actually the same. The Packers weren't talented enough to be capable of winning the Super Bowl. The interesting part about your take is that you criticize the players for not making enough plays yet in your opinion they were somehow capable of beating the Bucs. Of course you need to use hindsight to figure out which team was capable of winning the Super Bowl, I never mentioned anything different. Well, a pole vaulter was incapable of clearing a specific height until he actually makes it for the first time. Unfortunately the Packers only get one shot per season at making the Super Bowl. They actually got two to beat the Bucs this year but who cares. According to the Cambridge dictionary the definition of being capable of something is as follows: [I][B]having the ability, power or qualities to be able to do something.[/B][/I] There's no mentioning of theoretically being able to do something under the assumption of different what ifs happening or whatever. It's plain and simple being able to do something. Therefore, by definition, the Patriots weren't capable of winning the Super Bowl in 2007. That's a terrible comparison as a 94% free throw shooter has proven to be capable of making it. A miss doesn't change anything about that. Unfortunately as mentioned above the Packers don't get such a margin for error though. They only have one shot at winning the Super Bowl and they didn't get it done this season, hence not being capable of. They actually haven't been capable of even making it to the Super Bowl for 10 years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
45 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
51 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 6:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Front Office Under Fire
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
