Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DevilDon" data-source="post: 333311" data-attributes="member: 2057">You can argue the slow track at their shiddy site bodes well for offense or defense.It doesn't matter, the Packers are better on either side of the ball. I don't see a massive passing attack but we won't need it with this D.People think it's all of one and none of the other. I see us mixing run and pass with eloquence, keeping the Bears D hesitant. You know James Starks can run the ball and you know Rodgers is the best QB in football with the best WR corps. So pick your poison, or if not, watch as each on in turn poisons your vanilla D.The Packers D is almost as good as those mid 90's squads, very good but better at turnovers. Expect at least a touchdown margin of victory but  not much more by the Pack.</blockquote>

Total: 1,067 (members: 2, guests: 1,065)