Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers 1st round selection, #12 overall: Rashan Gary, DE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 842561" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>Sack totals are ONE relevant statistic. The issue people have with your argument is that you seem to think it is the most important one while others, myself included, don't feel that way. Personally, I think sacks are over rated. We have already talked about pressures and hurries and hits etc. HRE mentioned forced holding calls and then there are tackles for losses against players other than the QB. Essentially what you could call negative outcome plays for the offense. All are helpful and I can think of times when a sack would be less desirable than one of the other outcomes. </p><p></p><p>Take this scenario: You are down 1 point in the game. You are on defense and the opposing team has a third and 5 at their own 35 yard line. There is a minute 30 seconds left and you have no timeouts left. Instead of running the ball to run more time of the clock the offense decides to go for the kill and calls a pass play. You sack the QB for a 6 yard loss and they run off 35 seconds before they punt the ball. Or, you pressure the QB and he throws a bad pass an the ball falls incomplete stopping the clock and they have to punt. You just saved your offense 30 seconds by not sacking the QB. </p><p></p><p>I don't think anyone is claiming you are calling him a bust. I've never heard it. All I hear is you keep mentioning his college sack totals. </p><p></p><p>A lot of people were down on the pick and I understand why. They were falling into the same trap you did. Focusing on college sack totals. </p><p></p><p>After playing 1400 snaps (I don't know if that is accurate or you just made the number up but it doesn't matter we all know he played a lot of snaps so the actual number doesn't matter) I will admit that on the surface I would expect that a player with Gary's abilities to have more sacks. That is on the surface looking at the equation snaps + ability = sacks. However, it goes a lot deeper than that. Many people including former coaches and team mates have discounted his lack of sacks stating that the disruption he caused was far more valuable. Simply put if Gary's effort on a particular play resulted in another player getting the sack what difference does it make who gets the sack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 842561, member: 10247"] Sack totals are ONE relevant statistic. The issue people have with your argument is that you seem to think it is the most important one while others, myself included, don't feel that way. Personally, I think sacks are over rated. We have already talked about pressures and hurries and hits etc. HRE mentioned forced holding calls and then there are tackles for losses against players other than the QB. Essentially what you could call negative outcome plays for the offense. All are helpful and I can think of times when a sack would be less desirable than one of the other outcomes. Take this scenario: You are down 1 point in the game. You are on defense and the opposing team has a third and 5 at their own 35 yard line. There is a minute 30 seconds left and you have no timeouts left. Instead of running the ball to run more time of the clock the offense decides to go for the kill and calls a pass play. You sack the QB for a 6 yard loss and they run off 35 seconds before they punt the ball. Or, you pressure the QB and he throws a bad pass an the ball falls incomplete stopping the clock and they have to punt. You just saved your offense 30 seconds by not sacking the QB. I don't think anyone is claiming you are calling him a bust. I've never heard it. All I hear is you keep mentioning his college sack totals. A lot of people were down on the pick and I understand why. They were falling into the same trap you did. Focusing on college sack totals. After playing 1400 snaps (I don't know if that is accurate or you just made the number up but it doesn't matter we all know he played a lot of snaps so the actual number doesn't matter) I will admit that on the surface I would expect that a player with Gary's abilities to have more sacks. That is on the surface looking at the equation snaps + ability = sacks. However, it goes a lot deeper than that. Many people including former coaches and team mates have discounted his lack of sacks stating that the disruption he caused was far more valuable. Simply put if Gary's effort on a particular play resulted in another player getting the sack what difference does it make who gets the sack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Today at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 3:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Today at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers 1st round selection, #12 overall: Rashan Gary, DE
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top