Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer Secondary vs. Hawks Passing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarkAshton" data-source="post: 199449" data-attributes="member: 1017"><p>Today's Seattle PI had an interesting stat in a column by Art Theil. Theil is a good columnist in Seattle...there aren't many.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the stat is that Hasselbeck is actually equal to or slightly better than Favre was during the same stage in his career. Between the ages of 29-32 Favre's passer rating was 83.2 while Hasselbeck's was/is 86.6. He notes that there are many factors that can play into this but here's a real interesting one. During the same period (in ages), the Packers were 40-24 and the Seahawks were 41-23. </p><p></p><p>The years for Favre were from 1998-2001. </p><p></p><p>Just another meaning less stat but interesting. I think there will ever be another Favre...certainly not Hasselbeck...but our (Seattle's) QB is pretty good. Your secondary better be feeling good tomorrow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarkAshton, post: 199449, member: 1017"] Today's Seattle PI had an interesting stat in a column by Art Theil. Theil is a good columnist in Seattle...there aren't many. Anyway, the stat is that Hasselbeck is actually equal to or slightly better than Favre was during the same stage in his career. Between the ages of 29-32 Favre's passer rating was 83.2 while Hasselbeck's was/is 86.6. He notes that there are many factors that can play into this but here's a real interesting one. During the same period (in ages), the Packers were 40-24 and the Seahawks were 41-23. The years for Favre were from 1998-2001. Just another meaning less stat but interesting. I think there will ever be another Favre...certainly not Hasselbeck...but our (Seattle's) QB is pretty good. Your secondary better be feeling good tomorrow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: tynimiller
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:27 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer Secondary vs. Hawks Passing
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top