Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 807233" data-attributes="member: 7261">All teams lose guys like the Packers have and get cap strapped by guys they probably shouldn't have, its not just a Packer thing.  But with success, comes the NFL parity balance of picking later in each round of the draft.  Cellar dwellers finally become winners (See Rams and Bears). The Packers last top 10 pick was....BJ Raji (#9) in 2009.   I am smart enough to know that you will say "AJ Hawk (5), Jamal Reynolds (10), Terrell Buckley (5), Tony Madarich (2) guarantee you diddly".  You are right, but wins at the end of a meaningless season do exactly what?  I think over the course of history, the odds of picking a good player improves the higher you pick in each round.  If the Packers are going to lose 2 spots, instead of picking up 2 spots in the draft each week by winning a game, at this point I am fine with better draft position.Again, I am not advocating losing on purpose, but I would rather see the Packers get a lot of playing time in for younger guys, with an eye on the future and if our draft position improves because of it, even better.But,  Maybe we get lucky and find the next Aaron Donald @13.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,093 (members: 0, guests: 1,093)