Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Our porous secondary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 105617" data-attributes="member: 227"><p>Well then is it possible to have a sort of quick fix?</p><p></p><p>The way I see it:</p><p>- Get Culver starting. He is young, and will make rookie mistakes that will lead to big plays. Plus he isn't as strong against the run.</p><p></p><p>- Leave Manuel in there and hope he improves (again there isn't any sign of that yet). </p><p></p><p>- Sign a FA, wait until he understands the D system and plays, then have him start.</p><p></p><p>IMO none of these are real viable options for the moment. Culver would make most sense for the future, but if that move was made then would it imply the Packers are getting the young players more PT to get ready for the future?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="all about da packers, post: 105617, member: 227"] Well then is it possible to have a sort of quick fix? The way I see it: - Get Culver starting. He is young, and will make rookie mistakes that will lead to big plays. Plus he isn't as strong against the run. - Leave Manuel in there and hope he improves (again there isn't any sign of that yet). - Sign a FA, wait until he understands the D system and plays, then have him start. IMO none of these are real viable options for the moment. Culver would make most sense for the future, but if that move was made then would it imply the Packers are getting the young players more PT to get ready for the future? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Fat Dogs
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Thirteen Below
30 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: gopkrs
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 10:35 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Our porous secondary
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top