Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 577577" data-attributes="member: 10086">I somewhat disagree. My philosophy is liberal for a conservative and that's that there is no perfect cookie cutter DYeah, we both can agree that we would better off if we had a number 1 pass and a number 1 run D or the like. Ultimately it's a balanced attack that is most formidable and although this sounds rhetorical, it's if you Win.  In 2010 we measured our losses also. which none of then were more than 4pts a game. So I say its consistency, and like someone else in here said "putting yourself in the position to get "lucky" that last game or two. Then it's all out the window. It's all just whoever wants it the most on any given day. Within reason, a number #9 ranked D with proper discipline and cohesiveness can beat out a#2 ranked D. This is particularly so if they watch their Offense kicking butt.. Or a big special teams play.(c'mon Micah)And vise versa. This game is all about momentum. So to sum up my opinion, if we can get to a point where we are consistently allowing on D the teens and maybe low 20s. Well make the last poker table</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 261 (members: 0, guests: 261)