Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Opponents' thoughts about 2009 Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 246134" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>There're some differences between our 13-3 and your 13-3.</p><p>First, ours is 2 seasons away. Yours is 3.</p><p>Second and foremost, we have the youngest team in the league. You have an aging defense, and the defense was the focal point of your campaign. And you had no running game in 07. So your defense was average, and you couldn't run the ball. Hence the 7-9.</p><p>If you look at GB's campaign since Teddy came in, it's 4-12, 8-8, 13-3, 6-10. There was clear improvement except for last year. Calculaing total wins on a rebuilding team is no parameter. But I've stated before, I still can't tell which one is the fluke year. This year will determinate if it was 08 or 07.</p><p>And no GB fan in a clear state of mind (or at least making a serious analyzis) will say that the bears suck. Neither will say that the queens suck. But most GB fans will say that we are the better team. That's not to say the rivals are bad. I honestly believe this is the thoughest NFCN since God knows when.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 246134, member: 1429"] There're some differences between our 13-3 and your 13-3. First, ours is 2 seasons away. Yours is 3. Second and foremost, we have the youngest team in the league. You have an aging defense, and the defense was the focal point of your campaign. And you had no running game in 07. So your defense was average, and you couldn't run the ball. Hence the 7-9. If you look at GB's campaign since Teddy came in, it's 4-12, 8-8, 13-3, 6-10. There was clear improvement except for last year. Calculaing total wins on a rebuilding team is no parameter. But I've stated before, I still can't tell which one is the fluke year. This year will determinate if it was 08 or 07. And no GB fan in a clear state of mind (or at least making a serious analyzis) will say that the bears suck. Neither will say that the queens suck. But most GB fans will say that we are the better team. That's not to say the rivals are bad. I honestly believe this is the thoughest NFCN since God knows when. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 8:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Today at 7:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 6:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:53 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 4:58 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Opponents' thoughts about 2009 Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top