Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OLB Situation / Interesting Waiver wire prospects
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 787027" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>You know what, Rodgers MIGHT have taken less if it meant they could afford Mack. I'm not going to sit here and pretend to know what he would have done if asked. However, as I said before I don't think it was the money that kept Mack from coming here. It was the picks. Yes the Raiders gave a 2nd rounder back but they got a 4th( I think) Not that a 4th is huge but it is something. The even bigger picture though is why in the world would the Raiders even consider the Packers 2 first rounders AND giving back a second when it is fairly certain the Bears will be picking higher than the Packers. If you look at the deal that went down and think the Packers could have gotten the same you are crazy. It likely would have taken more than the Bears gave up for the Packers to have gotten Mack and they probably wouldn't have gotten a 2nd rounder back, so stop saying the Packers could have gotten Mack for what the Bears gave up. It just wouldn't happen. </p><p></p><p>So if Gute went to AR and said "would you take less if we signed Kahlil Mack" The agreement would have had to be ... lets call it X - Mack Money ... unless we don't get Mack then its X. and even that puts Gute is in a precarious position. To get Mack he has to give up multiple first rounders and then some If he can't come to an agreement with the Raiders he is facing a situation where his HOF QB just gave up millions of dollars to get Mack and he (Gute) failed to do that. You don't think that would **** Rodgers off?</p><p></p><p>About the only way they could have pulled it off is if they had two acceptable agreements in place with Rodgers beforehand and not announced it until after the Mack situation was settled. If they got Mack Rodgers signs the deal for less, if not he signs the deal for more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 787027, member: 10247"] You know what, Rodgers MIGHT have taken less if it meant they could afford Mack. I'm not going to sit here and pretend to know what he would have done if asked. However, as I said before I don't think it was the money that kept Mack from coming here. It was the picks. Yes the Raiders gave a 2nd rounder back but they got a 4th( I think) Not that a 4th is huge but it is something. The even bigger picture though is why in the world would the Raiders even consider the Packers 2 first rounders AND giving back a second when it is fairly certain the Bears will be picking higher than the Packers. If you look at the deal that went down and think the Packers could have gotten the same you are crazy. It likely would have taken more than the Bears gave up for the Packers to have gotten Mack and they probably wouldn't have gotten a 2nd rounder back, so stop saying the Packers could have gotten Mack for what the Bears gave up. It just wouldn't happen. So if Gute went to AR and said "would you take less if we signed Kahlil Mack" The agreement would have had to be ... lets call it X - Mack Money ... unless we don't get Mack then its X. and even that puts Gute is in a precarious position. To get Mack he has to give up multiple first rounders and then some If he can't come to an agreement with the Raiders he is facing a situation where his HOF QB just gave up millions of dollars to get Mack and he (Gute) failed to do that. You don't think that would **** Rodgers off? About the only way they could have pulled it off is if they had two acceptable agreements in place with Rodgers beforehand and not announced it until after the Mack situation was settled. If they got Mack Rodgers signs the deal for less, if not he signs the deal for more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
Wisky newbie
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 9:25 AM
Introduce Yourself
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:24 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:16 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OLB Situation / Interesting Waiver wire prospects
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
