Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OJ Howard rumored to be on trade block...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 871807"><p>Howard has the potential to become an elite tight end though. On the other hand Burton is a risky option because of his injury history.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers should definitely not strive for getting a top 15 pick in next year's draft. Howard might significantly improve the Packers chances of winning a Super Bowl.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>True, you have to consider that it would cost at least $6 million to retain Howard after this season though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>With Rodgers championship window closing fast the Packers are in a win now mode. Therefore they need to take some risks to win another Super Bowl.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again, Gutekunst needs to consider that means paying Howard. I'm not opposed to trade for him but that has to be accounted for.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Obviously the Packers would make the deal to improve their chances of winning a Super Bowl over the next two seasons.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't believe the Buccaneers would be interested in acquiring Jamaal Williams either. Adding a second pick to trade for Howard on top of it would definitely be too much compensation in my opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I wouldn't have any confidence in Dexter Williams and Ervin being the primary backups at running back entering the season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 871807"] Howard has the potential to become an elite tight end though. On the other hand Burton is a risky option because of his injury history. The Packers should definitely not strive for getting a top 15 pick in next year's draft. Howard might significantly improve the Packers chances of winning a Super Bowl. True, you have to consider that it would cost at least $6 million to retain Howard after this season though. With Rodgers championship window closing fast the Packers are in a win now mode. Therefore they need to take some risks to win another Super Bowl. Once again, Gutekunst needs to consider that means paying Howard. I'm not opposed to trade for him but that has to be accounted for. Obviously the Packers would make the deal to improve their chances of winning a Super Bowl over the next two seasons. I don't believe the Buccaneers would be interested in acquiring Jamaal Williams either. Adding a second pick to trade for Howard on top of it would definitely be too much compensation in my opinion. I wouldn't have any confidence in Dexter Williams and Ervin being the primary backups at running back entering the season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
R
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: rmontro
Today at 5:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Trade Candidates
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 5:11 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 4:31 PM
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 4:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:25 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OJ Howard rumored to be on trade block...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top