Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Week 17 Green Bay vs Minnesota Pre-game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1053052" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>One thing I’ve been doing recently is going back and watching the previous meeting. It’s not a perfect reflection on both teams strengths, but it’s the best one we have as far as how do we play directly on matchups.</p><p></p><p>Observations:</p><p></p><p>1. Jordan Love was absolutely, positively, unequivocally both playing partially injured and rusty. For over 2 quarters the majority of throws were off timing, too high, too low or extremely poor decisions. Love passes were more often .5 sec late. It was a D grade performance by him across 2 full quarters imo. One of his worst accuracy games across near 2 seasons. </p><p>2. While both teams were undisciplined, GB was over the top making mistakes that have free biscuits to MN. I’d put that game and our 1st Lions “rain” game as the pure sloppiest play. The dropped passes (partly bad throws) were consistently bad. Yellow flags at every corner.</p><p></p><p>3. Christian Watson was lost end of 1st qtr and Luke Musgrave also went out very early. Both were integral plans as evidenced by targets early. Musgrave was 3/3 16 yards (25 snaps) and Watson 0/1 (9 snaps) Both had little to zero impact last meeting. So #9 status in this one is only neutral or a + from last meeting. Projecting Musgrave will conceivably be used limited but similar to last meeting. He had 8 snaps vs Saints last week. 20 snaps?</p><p></p><p>4. Vikings are a very good Run D, but we did move the ball closer to average on them. Hard to Run the ball down at 0-28. Should see a little more clock control. Hopefully we get Jacobs involved in short passing where he’s been very effective lately.</p><p></p><p>5. Narveson was terrible. Possibly lost us that game directly. TWO first half drives spoiled when he shanked 2 Kicks that erased -6 points. Highly unlikely that McNamath misses multiple tries. More likely he Wins the game than multiple missed FG.</p><p></p><p>6. Several times we rushed 4 on 3rd and 10+. Each time MN nailed a 20 yard pass. Preston played at D+ grade. He looked like he was checked out going through motions. We appeared to stay in lanes so QB wouldn’t run. Hopefully Haf saw that. I’d rather be aggressive and send 5 and make him throw a 5-10 yarder in 3rd n 14. Stop letting them dictate and pick our secondary apart.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1053052, member: 10086"] One thing I’ve been doing recently is going back and watching the previous meeting. It’s not a perfect reflection on both teams strengths, but it’s the best one we have as far as how do we play directly on matchups. Observations: 1. Jordan Love was absolutely, positively, unequivocally both playing partially injured and rusty. For over 2 quarters the majority of throws were off timing, too high, too low or extremely poor decisions. Love passes were more often .5 sec late. It was a D grade performance by him across 2 full quarters imo. One of his worst accuracy games across near 2 seasons. 2. While both teams were undisciplined, GB was over the top making mistakes that have free biscuits to MN. I’d put that game and our 1st Lions “rain” game as the pure sloppiest play. The dropped passes (partly bad throws) were consistently bad. Yellow flags at every corner. 3. Christian Watson was lost end of 1st qtr and Luke Musgrave also went out very early. Both were integral plans as evidenced by targets early. Musgrave was 3/3 16 yards (25 snaps) and Watson 0/1 (9 snaps) Both had little to zero impact last meeting. So #9 status in this one is only neutral or a + from last meeting. Projecting Musgrave will conceivably be used limited but similar to last meeting. He had 8 snaps vs Saints last week. 20 snaps? 4. Vikings are a very good Run D, but we did move the ball closer to average on them. Hard to Run the ball down at 0-28. Should see a little more clock control. Hopefully we get Jacobs involved in short passing where he’s been very effective lately. 5. Narveson was terrible. Possibly lost us that game directly. TWO first half drives spoiled when he shanked 2 Kicks that erased -6 points. Highly unlikely that McNamath misses multiple tries. More likely he Wins the game than multiple missed FG. 6. Several times we rushed 4 on 3rd and 10+. Each time MN nailed a 20 yard pass. Preston played at D+ grade. He looked like he was checked out going through motions. We appeared to stay in lanes so QB wouldn’t run. Hopefully Haf saw that. I’d rather be aggressive and send 5 and make him throw a 5-10 yarder in 3rd n 14. Stop letting them dictate and pick our secondary apart. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Hos327
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Week 17 Green Bay vs Minnesota Pre-game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
