Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official studs and duds Viking game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 843209" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I'd say it was clear interference. The NFL officials Twitter had Cook highlighted. He looked like a fullback leading up in the hole on Savage. IMHO, clear and obvious OPI.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is the part I think some people get wrong, or at minimum, are communicating their grump poorly.</p><p></p><p>The league did not review the play due to OPI. This was caught during the "all scoring plays are reviewed" rule. So they reviewed the play, saw OPI and threw the metaphorical flag. This was a stated outcome when the rules committee presented the rule change to the owners.</p><p></p><p>I feel conflicted on this. It was pretty clear OPI to me, but the idea that a penalty can be throw after the fact is a little odd to me.</p><p></p><p>That said, this is already allowed for 12 men--flag can be thrown after the fact. That one is a little more cut and dried, but there is still an example of this basic procedure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 843209, member: 4199"] I'd say it was clear interference. The NFL officials Twitter had Cook highlighted. He looked like a fullback leading up in the hole on Savage. IMHO, clear and obvious OPI. This is the part I think some people get wrong, or at minimum, are communicating their grump poorly. The league did not review the play due to OPI. This was caught during the "all scoring plays are reviewed" rule. So they reviewed the play, saw OPI and threw the metaphorical flag. This was a stated outcome when the rules committee presented the rule change to the owners. I feel conflicted on this. It was pretty clear OPI to me, but the idea that a penalty can be throw after the fact is a little odd to me. That said, this is already allowed for 12 men--flag can be thrown after the fact. That one is a little more cut and dried, but there is still an example of this basic procedure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
22 minutes ago
All Other Sports
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 12:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 11:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: BrokenArrow
Yesterday at 5:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official studs and duds Viking game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top