Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Packers vs Rams thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Croak" data-source="post: 627484" data-attributes="member: 2367"><p>Someone said something like; "Stats are used like a drunk uses a lampost; for support and not illumination." <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" /> I know it is cliche but in football, in the end the only stat that matters is the one that lists W-L. </p><p></p><p>Your Rams are a fine team. I know you aren't saying that they are definitely going to win. What you are saying is that they have a good chance. I can't disagree with that.</p><p></p><p> I think it is also important to note that without Jordy the Packers are definitely not as adept at the real long ball that we saw last year in the chemistry between him and Aaron . What they have now though is very effective, because they don't just have Lacey, they have Starks. Both are quality running backs. Both capable of going inside or outside. Both capable of breaking off big runs. Combine those with Aaron Rodgers ability to make very quick reads and avoid hard rushes and that short game becomes bread and butter. I'm think it is going to be a real interesting chess match to see how this offense works around that front four of yours. I expect some surprises from this offense now that MM isn't making the play calls.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Croak, post: 627484, member: 2367"] Someone said something like; "Stats are used like a drunk uses a lampost; for support and not illumination." :roflmao: I know it is cliche but in football, in the end the only stat that matters is the one that lists W-L. Your Rams are a fine team. I know you aren't saying that they are definitely going to win. What you are saying is that they have a good chance. I can't disagree with that. I think it is also important to note that without Jordy the Packers are definitely not as adept at the real long ball that we saw last year in the chemistry between him and Aaron . What they have now though is very effective, because they don't just have Lacey, they have Starks. Both are quality running backs. Both capable of going inside or outside. Both capable of breaking off big runs. Combine those with Aaron Rodgers ability to make very quick reads and avoid hard rushes and that short game becomes bread and butter. I'm think it is going to be a real interesting chess match to see how this offense works around that front four of yours. I expect some surprises from this offense now that MM isn't making the play calls. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
GreenBaySlacker
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: milani
38 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 9:25 AM
Introduce Yourself
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Packers vs Rams thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top