Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OFFICIAL Packers VS Lions - The Matt Flynn Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Barrysghost" data-source="post: 418229" data-attributes="member: 5376"><p>Sorry about the additional tap of a space bar. I can see how that would be annoying, and how people might not understand "no where" the same as "nowhere". Thank you for the correction. Using a phrase like "perpetually injured" when you mean "prone to significant injury" is not hyperbole (which is defined as an exaggeration used for effect). The two phrases mean entirely different things, one is not an extreme of the other. "Prone to" suggests that the guy COULD get injured due to past injury, while "perpetually" suggests that the guy is currently injured and likely always will be. If you can define hyperbole, try using it correctly. You see, I wasn't correcting 'gammar' so much as an entirely inaccurate statement.</p><p> </p><p>Been a member since Jan 24, 2011? from Indiana?</p><p>coughcoughCOUGHfairweatherfan!COUGHcough....</p><p> </p><p>The comment about Manning must've struck a nerve.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Barrysghost, post: 418229, member: 5376"] Sorry about the additional tap of a space bar. I can see how that would be annoying, and how people might not understand "no where" the same as "nowhere". Thank you for the correction. Using a phrase like "perpetually injured" when you mean "prone to significant injury" is not hyperbole (which is defined as an exaggeration used for effect). The two phrases mean entirely different things, one is not an extreme of the other. "Prone to" suggests that the guy COULD get injured due to past injury, while "perpetually" suggests that the guy is currently injured and likely always will be. If you can define hyperbole, try using it correctly. You see, I wasn't correcting 'gammar' so much as an entirely inaccurate statement. Been a member since Jan 24, 2011? from Indiana? coughcoughCOUGHfairweatherfan!COUGHcough.... The comment about Manning must've struck a nerve. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
Magooch
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 2:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 2:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OFFICIAL Packers VS Lions - The Matt Flynn Game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top