Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NOMOFO" data-source="post: 581855" data-attributes="member: 9687">My Lord. We can do this all day. Unlike captaingooglmeister, I don't spend all my waking hours doing google research. It was my mistake from memory that Seattle was 3-2. I thought both of them and SF had losing records...but...whatever.   My comment on SOS remains the same. There are many different ways to figure SOS. I tend to think in today's NFL, to only look at one that breaks it down by wins and losses doesn't prove much. Last week I posted web links to different sites that figured SOS differently. No clue where those were posted and honestly, I'm really not all that interested in wasting time trying to find it again.Superior methodology? Ahhhhhhh...ya... I suppose if I actually watch a team play several times and somebody else doesn't, I might actually have some insight. As you would and as anyone would. Really makes a lot of sense to argue that.By eye test however I was talking about actually looking at a teams schedule and considering who is on it! It really is comical how hard some people try to prove out what they project will be future results without even a hint of honestly looking at facts! Perfect example is exactly what you yourself did with the Rams! I could not agree more! Yet, it's the Bills that are the "team de jour" even though they haven't proven SHI# or played HALF the schedule as the Rams.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 471 (members: 0, guests: 471)