Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Daryl Muellenberg" data-source="post: 636063" data-attributes="member: 9708">Ummm, you do realize the Vikings have a winning record and the Pack beat them Sunday - so how is that 0 wins for 2015??? Rodgers missed half the year in 2013, so you really can't count that year. In 2014 the Pack beat 4 teams with winning records (counting the victory over the Cowboys in the playoffs) and 3 other games where the opponent was at 500 when they played them (4 if you included the first game of the year). They came within 1 play of going to the Super Bowl that year, so I don't think you can really call that underachieving.  They shouldn't have lost to Detroit this year, but losing to Denver and Carolina wasn't all that unexpected. And as you know, even if you have the greatest qb ever it is still a team sport, he can't play defense or catch his own passes. But I suppose some fans will agree that if they don't win the Super Bowl then they are underachieving.I wouldn't call the Vikings over achievers (which means they are playing above their talent). The Vikings have beaten teams with worse records, which is what a team is supposed to do. Because of their record they may be over rated (considering they haven't beaten a team with a winning record), but I wouldn't call them over achievers.</blockquote>

Total: 91 (members: 1, guests: 90)