Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Half Empty" data-source="post: 641519" data-attributes="member: 10288">Interesting.  My original comment was mostly because yours was an exact quote from Vic's column, or was from the days I read it.I kinda understand your position, especially having watched the Pack since pre-Lombardi days.  Running the Packer Sweep with the players we had then was a pretty reliable way to win.  However, I personally think that a more talented team can be beat if the wrong plays are called.  We've seen the Vikes beaten when not using their main weapon, Peterson.  If the '60s Packers had chosen to go deep to Dale and Dowler all the time, how would that have worked out?  If one has the better overall talent AND chooses to use it properly, I'll take the bet.  Obviously, another subjective and un-provable argument/discussion, but there is another side.  Somewhat like the continuing controversy of TT vs MM - does one not procure the best talent, or does the other misuse it?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 359 (members: 1, guests: 358)