Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OFFICIAL Mike McCarthy Took Back Play callin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="828Packer" data-source="post: 633018" data-attributes="member: 11186"><p>My entire argument has gone over your head.</p><p></p><p>I have played A LOT of football and coached A LOT of football. I understand what base D's are however I wasn't discussing schematic bases more than I was discussing philosophy, approach and planning. I don't care what base D we are seeing, playing in the box is a relative term. Committing 6 or 7 guys to the box against GB could be considered loading the box when comparing it to previous years. A base 3-5 can drop an LB and RAM in coverage and only have 5 guys committed to the box, post snap. Most teams in the last few years have not committed many guys in the box or in pass rush against us. This year is different. You can chalk it up to the OL however this is the EXACT same OL that Rodgers won an MVP with last year.</p><p></p><p>No, the solution is not to call deep plays. I have never said that. The solution is to find a serviceable deep threat that can keep defenses honest. Carolina plays a cover 5 and blitzed Kurt Coleman A LOT. When was the last time you saw a team get pressure with their secondary and LB's against a GB passing attack, as much as they have the last 2 weeks? They do not respect us over the top, PLAIN AND SIMPLE...... and when they don't respect us downfield, they can take a lot more chances within 10 yards of the LOS. They can stunt more, they can blitz more, they can bring secondary blitzes more, and THEY ARE. Jordy usually required a corner and a safety over the top in coverage, nearly every play. Richard Rodgers and Cobb playing underneath Jordy, could usually neutralize 2 LB's or another safety and LB thus giving the OL an ideal situation which resulted in ample time for Rodgers. Without Jordy, decent defenses are much more apt to play man to man, and commit more pressure to Rodgers. I'm not sure why you're having a hard time seeing that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="828Packer, post: 633018, member: 11186"] My entire argument has gone over your head. I have played A LOT of football and coached A LOT of football. I understand what base D's are however I wasn't discussing schematic bases more than I was discussing philosophy, approach and planning. I don't care what base D we are seeing, playing in the box is a relative term. Committing 6 or 7 guys to the box against GB could be considered loading the box when comparing it to previous years. A base 3-5 can drop an LB and RAM in coverage and only have 5 guys committed to the box, post snap. Most teams in the last few years have not committed many guys in the box or in pass rush against us. This year is different. You can chalk it up to the OL however this is the EXACT same OL that Rodgers won an MVP with last year. No, the solution is not to call deep plays. I have never said that. The solution is to find a serviceable deep threat that can keep defenses honest. Carolina plays a cover 5 and blitzed Kurt Coleman A LOT. When was the last time you saw a team get pressure with their secondary and LB's against a GB passing attack, as much as they have the last 2 weeks? They do not respect us over the top, PLAIN AND SIMPLE...... and when they don't respect us downfield, they can take a lot more chances within 10 yards of the LOS. They can stunt more, they can blitz more, they can bring secondary blitzes more, and THEY ARE. Jordy usually required a corner and a safety over the top in coverage, nearly every play. Richard Rodgers and Cobb playing underneath Jordy, could usually neutralize 2 LB's or another safety and LB thus giving the OL an ideal situation which resulted in ample time for Rodgers. Without Jordy, decent defenses are much more apt to play man to man, and commit more pressure to Rodgers. I'm not sure why you're having a hard time seeing that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 9:25 AM
Introduce Yourself
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:16 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OFFICIAL Mike McCarthy Took Back Play callin
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
