Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 766186" data-attributes="member: 12283">If that 22 is the guaranteed portion, then we’re talking about a two year deal, 11/season in reality. I like the length, but not the $. Graham is brittle and limited in his skill set. He may be the most dominant RZ target in the game, but we don’t struggle there. We also cut a big RZ threat to sign him. So the net gain comes down to his position and the fact that they can play both him and Jordy’s replacement at the same time. That’s not nothing, but it’s also not worth the space in my opinion.Hopefully the FO saw something on tape about how he can still be unlocked in other ways. It’s possible that Bevell wasn’t getting the most out of him. But by and large the Packers were desperate. The hole at the position was glaring and it’s hard to find rookie starters at TE. This at least allows them to draft and develop a successor.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,123 (members: 1, guests: 1,122)