Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Giants studs n duds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shanghai Pack" data-source="post: 681238" data-attributes="member: 9293"><p>I just didn't see it that way. The second interception was off. But many of the incompletions, even though they weren't plays that were made, were accurately placed. On the drive where we got the field goal to go up to 23, he placed two balls into the end zone for Rodgers and Nelson and both were perfectly placed where no defender could have possibly got it. Rodgers dropped his, Nelson didn't fight his second hand free from the defender and tried to one hand catch it. Earlier James Starks dropped a swing screen pass that would have been a walk in for TD. Rodgers then threw a pick two plays later that Nelson should have caught but batted it up instead. There were plenty of other throws he was dead on, but I just mentioned those in particular because without a couple of key drops here or there, the stat line for Rodgers could have easily been 290 Yrds, 4 TDs, 1 INT, instead of 260, 2 TDs and 2 INT. A decent difference if the receivers just catch the ball that's in their hands and ones where, if they had happened, I don't think a single person would be talking about Rodgers accuracy right now. The guy is fine. The receivers are still a question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shanghai Pack, post: 681238, member: 9293"] I just didn't see it that way. The second interception was off. But many of the incompletions, even though they weren't plays that were made, were accurately placed. On the drive where we got the field goal to go up to 23, he placed two balls into the end zone for Rodgers and Nelson and both were perfectly placed where no defender could have possibly got it. Rodgers dropped his, Nelson didn't fight his second hand free from the defender and tried to one hand catch it. Earlier James Starks dropped a swing screen pass that would have been a walk in for TD. Rodgers then threw a pick two plays later that Nelson should have caught but batted it up instead. There were plenty of other throws he was dead on, but I just mentioned those in particular because without a couple of key drops here or there, the stat line for Rodgers could have easily been 290 Yrds, 4 TDs, 1 INT, instead of 260, 2 TDs and 2 INT. A decent difference if the receivers just catch the ball that's in their hands and ones where, if they had happened, I don't think a single person would be talking about Rodgers accuracy right now. The guy is fine. The receivers are still a question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Calebs Revenge
Latest posts
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: BrokenArrow
Today at 5:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 4:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Hire New Defensive Coordinator: Jeff Hafley, formerly Head Coach, Boston College
Latest: Krabs
Today at 2:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Giants studs n duds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top