Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Powarun" data-source="post: 404162" data-attributes="member: 2112">You're right.WTF, is 4 touchdowns with under 300 yards not good enough to get nominated?  Or is the fact that we played a weaker opponent, but a DIVISION RIVAL not good enough?Lets see Brady had more yards less completion percentage and less touchdowns but hey we always need to have Brady, or else the AFC will feel left out.  And we must all love Brady or you hate football.Brees just throws a lot so lets just put him on there, even though the Falcons did a good job of keeping him in check.  But hey he is Drew Brees and who can forget him raising his kid in the SB.And OMG the stars aligned and Romo had a decent game, we MUST COVER THIS!! EVERYONE LOVES DALLAS.  Yes he had good accuracy and was a good pick to be nominated, its hard to argue this one with facts, EXEPT FLYNN WAS %100 and had a run in touchdown.Yes that is Packers biased but how was Rodgers not even nominated?  Are they afraid that yes it will become the FedEX Air Rodgers award?  Hopefully he gets nominated for NFC Offensive player of the week, but I doubt it, its probably going to Romo so everyone can have a field day.On another note, I just realize the dock in OS X acts as a mirror to text if its close enough.</blockquote>

Total: 214 (members: 2, guests: 212)