Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 668860">You can win without a top 10 QB, if such a classification even exists.  I wouldn't consider Wilson a top 10 QB; he might have looked like one at times because of the wins put on the board thanks to the defensive supporting cast.The elite QBs are a smaller group than 10.  Who fills out the top 10 in any given year changes largely based on team success.  Take the supporting cast away (Brees, E. Manning), and the general perception is a fall in status even if what you're looking at is the exact same player.A good QB is sufficient for winning if the other pieces are in place.  What must be avoided is paying a guy like Flaco or Wilson elite money for good or lesser performance.  There's a lot of that going around.One the special benefits of having an elite QB while paying him elite money is that you get your money's worth.  Lesser QBs paid elite money, even if one were to regard them as top 10, is an impediment.</blockquote>

Total: 1,051 (members: 3, guests: 1,048)