Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Offensive Weapons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 725809"><p>I would hardly be shocked if the WR group was Nelson, Adams, Cobb, Allison and Yancey, with 2 of the 3 you noted not making the roster.</p><p></p><p>In fact, I would not be surprised if none of those 3 make the roster, given the 3 TEs are likely to get a fair number of snaps and Montgomery has position flexibility in moving to the slot in a pinch.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't pen in Allison and Yancey at this stage since the #4 and #5 spots should be competitive, but Allison did move ahead Janis and Davis last year and Yancey's draft status gives him an edge over Dupre.</p><p></p><p>Yancey's size and strength (21 lifts), along with what looks to me like long speed in his 4.53 time, might qualify him for a gunner job which would make Janis expendable.</p><p></p><p>In any event, I would expect the receiver group to be 5 or 6, but not 7, and I'm leaning toward 5. When you get to those bottom 8 roster spots that don't make the game day roster, if the basic depth requirements have been filled in the top 45, the remaining spots can come down to perceived potential with less regard to position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 725809"] I would hardly be shocked if the WR group was Nelson, Adams, Cobb, Allison and Yancey, with 2 of the 3 you noted not making the roster. In fact, I would not be surprised if none of those 3 make the roster, given the 3 TEs are likely to get a fair number of snaps and Montgomery has position flexibility in moving to the slot in a pinch. I wouldn't pen in Allison and Yancey at this stage since the #4 and #5 spots should be competitive, but Allison did move ahead Janis and Davis last year and Yancey's draft status gives him an edge over Dupre. Yancey's size and strength (21 lifts), along with what looks to me like long speed in his 4.53 time, might qualify him for a gunner job which would make Janis expendable. In any event, I would expect the receiver group to be 5 or 6, but not 7, and I'm leaning toward 5. When you get to those bottom 8 roster spots that don't make the game day roster, if the basic depth requirements have been filled in the top 45, the remaining spots can come down to perceived potential with less regard to position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
SudsMcBucky
Poppa San
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: SudsMcBucky
51 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:15 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:26 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:57 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Offensive Weapons
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top