Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1094135" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Hey [USER=9942]@gopkrs[/USER] I’m not directing it at you personally so please don’t be offended. I highly doubt you started these themes. They have a hint of accuracy that we should use our own ability to study the film and learn about various aspects of said film to form a personal opinion. I totally agree with that principal on an island. I’m all about being original and educate ourselves in the matters. I respect that.</p><p></p><p>The general theme that gets started is this. Not wired for word but thematic.</p><p></p><p>“Stats don’t matter they are bad”</p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p>“PFF isn’t Gospel”</p><p></p><p>The point I’d make is this. When I ask fans to display to me a better grading system than PFF? The 2 same answers I routinely get are</p><p>a. I use the “Eye test”</p><p>b. I trust those that have played the game etc etc.</p><p></p><p>If you’re relying on my eye test to form a reliable opinion you’re at best doomed! My advice to anyone is always Use a proper sample size and apply my opinion against others and see if they see what I see. But never rely on a singular eye test and certainly don’t imply the eye test shouldn’t be weighted against recorded results.</p><p>Use both.</p><p></p><p>PFF uses HUNDREDS of eye tests from NFL aficionados like us (being funny here). There’s inaccuracy and sometimes it doesn’t match production. So bend it the way you see fit. Yet PFF is still proven to be a nice baseline imo. </p><p></p><p>PFF is not the end all. It is a good tool to get a baseline. My advice in general (not direct at you personally) Do the research and apply it against statistical evidence of production. Then against what others like us are seeing as a group. Chile isn’t made with 4 cans of tomato sauce and served without additive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1094135, member: 10086"] Hey [USER=9942]@gopkrs[/USER] I’m not directing it at you personally so please don’t be offended. I highly doubt you started these themes. They have a hint of accuracy that we should use our own ability to study the film and learn about various aspects of said film to form a personal opinion. I totally agree with that principal on an island. I’m all about being original and educate ourselves in the matters. I respect that. The general theme that gets started is this. Not wired for word but thematic. “Stats don’t matter they are bad” and “PFF isn’t Gospel” The point I’d make is this. When I ask fans to display to me a better grading system than PFF? The 2 same answers I routinely get are a. I use the “Eye test” b. I trust those that have played the game etc etc. If you’re relying on my eye test to form a reliable opinion you’re at best doomed! My advice to anyone is always Use a proper sample size and apply my opinion against others and see if they see what I see. But never rely on a singular eye test and certainly don’t imply the eye test shouldn’t be weighted against recorded results. Use both. PFF uses HUNDREDS of eye tests from NFL aficionados like us (being funny here). There’s inaccuracy and sometimes it doesn’t match production. So bend it the way you see fit. Yet PFF is still proven to be a nice baseline imo. PFF is not the end all. It is a good tool to get a baseline. My advice in general (not direct at you personally) Do the research and apply it against statistical evidence of production. Then against what others like us are seeing as a group. Chile isn’t made with 4 cans of tomato sauce and served without additive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
