Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
No Perry this weekend
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 693043"><p>I agree he's better suited to SS or slot corner, variations within the same species. When the assignment is specific...deep 1/3 of the field in low/high zone coverage, blitz, coming up to fill a run hole...he looks pretty good. My problem is that when he's in single high safety free to read and react to what he sees, which is why they're called "free safety" in the first place, he just doesn't seem to be consistently around the ball.</p><p></p><p>This is evidenced in his 4 passes defended this year, a low count. And that's not a one-off...it's 13 over nearly 3 full seasons of about a 95% snap counts in the aggregate.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying he isn't a decent player. What I am saying is shelling out the kind of money we're talking about for a guy playing out of position should be questioned. If the Packers were a consistent 2-high safety zone team I might have a somewhat different view, but when the CB crew isn't decimated, the Capers D is primarily a man/blitz team which calls for a natural free safety.</p><p></p><p>While Clinton-Dix is due a very favorable comparison to Jennings, that's about as low a bar to hurdle and you can get. McMillian was never going to be more than a zone/box SS so that's not a valid point of comparison.</p><p></p><p>There is always the question, "who else ya got?" and with plenty of other holes to fill there is the temptation to go with the know quantity and not create yet another problem. But that's a question for 2018. From my perspective, Randall is the natural free safety on this roster, a guy who looks way better facing the ball than with his back to it, though the realization of this fact is unknown. Without a better perimeter corner group, such a move can't be contemplated.</p><p></p><p>But from this viewpoint, then, the need is in the perimeter corner area, not a panic signing of an out-of-position safety.</p><p></p><p>If it were to be a higher average per season, it should not be materially so. Waiting also provides a one-year insurance policy against injury or regression. Sure, if he blossomed into a Pro Bowl player in year 4, then you'd have a point. But when you consider he's essentially the same player now that he was in his rookie season, you'd figure he's fully formed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 693043"] I agree he's better suited to SS or slot corner, variations within the same species. When the assignment is specific...deep 1/3 of the field in low/high zone coverage, blitz, coming up to fill a run hole...he looks pretty good. My problem is that when he's in single high safety free to read and react to what he sees, which is why they're called "free safety" in the first place, he just doesn't seem to be consistently around the ball. This is evidenced in his 4 passes defended this year, a low count. And that's not a one-off...it's 13 over nearly 3 full seasons of about a 95% snap counts in the aggregate. I'm not saying he isn't a decent player. What I am saying is shelling out the kind of money we're talking about for a guy playing out of position should be questioned. If the Packers were a consistent 2-high safety zone team I might have a somewhat different view, but when the CB crew isn't decimated, the Capers D is primarily a man/blitz team which calls for a natural free safety. While Clinton-Dix is due a very favorable comparison to Jennings, that's about as low a bar to hurdle and you can get. McMillian was never going to be more than a zone/box SS so that's not a valid point of comparison. There is always the question, "who else ya got?" and with plenty of other holes to fill there is the temptation to go with the know quantity and not create yet another problem. But that's a question for 2018. From my perspective, Randall is the natural free safety on this roster, a guy who looks way better facing the ball than with his back to it, though the realization of this fact is unknown. Without a better perimeter corner group, such a move can't be contemplated. But from this viewpoint, then, the need is in the perimeter corner area, not a panic signing of an out-of-position safety. If it were to be a higher average per season, it should not be materially so. Waiting also provides a one-year insurance policy against injury or regression. Sure, if he blossomed into a Pro Bowl player in year 4, then you'd have a point. But when you consider he's essentially the same player now that he was in his rookie season, you'd figure he's fully formed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
gopkrs
Half Empty
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
25 minutes ago
College Sports
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
54 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:24 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
No Perry this weekend
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top