Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 549402" data-attributes="member: 4300">I didn’t think he was doing well before the injury but IMO that is partly due to the Packers requiring OL to learn multiple positions. Because of the number of OL active on game day they have to have some versatility but I think learning three positions on the OL slows the progress of some rookie OL. OTOH, it’s probably the best way a rookie can make the active roster if he isn't starting so this isn’t a criticism. My point is if Sherrod would have been put at one of the OT spots and stayed there, we would have a better idea of his progress.Unfortunately that's moot at this point because of that damn injury.The first three years of his salary were guaranteed and this of course is year four, so I agree he isn’t a lock for the roster. As to how many OL are drafted, if you include UDFA (probably for the interior of the OL) there could be 3, but not necessarily drafted. BTW, there are 12 OL on the roster now.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 983 (members: 0, guests: 983)