Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 948505" data-attributes="member: 10441">and you've failed to come up with something better.  with a larger and much more statistically relevant sample size, we see a very tiny advantage, and they still don't bother to break it down if it's on the first drive or after they have both had the ball, which is relevant.  Because if it's just based on who had ball first and the majority of those have been games in which both have possessed the ball, all it means is they had an extra possession along the way, and we're right back where we started.  Do we really need to extend games for a paltry 2% that end in the same "inequality" as if we kept everything the same right now?  why?You may feel the coin flip decides the games.  I still happen to think it's football that decides the games.  Special teams, offense, defense.  Play it, go win it.  Be done with it.  The game has been played.  It's NEVER going to be fair or equal.</blockquote>

Total: 107 (members: 2, guests: 105)