Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC Power Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BorderRivals.com" data-source="post: 499223" data-attributes="member: 6416"><p>Lot of media (and Rodell) falling in love with the big offseason winners. But, let's step back here and take a real look at things. We did that, offering our own "objective" rankings and they are a bit different than most in that Seattle is not in the top-2 and the Vikes are not quite as high as some may think: <a href="http://wp.me/p29VCs-i9" target="_blank">http://wp.me/p29VCs-i9</a></p><p> </p><p>NFC North:</p><p>2. Packers</p><p>8. Bears</p><p>9. Vikings</p><p>12. Lions</p><p> </p><p>What I found most amazing is that most focus exclusively on the additions, while not accounting for the subtractions. For instance, Seattle got Avril and Bennett in free agency, therefore they must be better! But, no one talks about the fact that Chris Clemmons is injured and he's better than both. So those two are short-term replacements that probably won't duplicate what they got from Clemmons last year. Therefore, they didn't actually get better. Plus, let's be honest for a second, did any of us really fear Avril? He was a "big" name only because the DE market was weak.</p><p> </p><p>So what do you think? Which are right, which are wrong?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BorderRivals.com, post: 499223, member: 6416"] Lot of media (and Rodell) falling in love with the big offseason winners. But, let's step back here and take a real look at things. We did that, offering our own "objective" rankings and they are a bit different than most in that Seattle is not in the top-2 and the Vikes are not quite as high as some may think: [url]http://wp.me/p29VCs-i9[/url] NFC North: 2. Packers 8. Bears 9. Vikings 12. Lions What I found most amazing is that most focus exclusively on the additions, while not accounting for the subtractions. For instance, Seattle got Avril and Bennett in free agency, therefore they must be better! But, no one talks about the fact that Chris Clemmons is injured and he's better than both. So those two are short-term replacements that probably won't duplicate what they got from Clemmons last year. Therefore, they didn't actually get better. Plus, let's be honest for a second, did any of us really fear Avril? He was a "big" name only because the DE market was weak. So what do you think? Which are right, which are wrong? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
PackerDNA
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC Power Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top