Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Packer Articles
Packer Articles
NFC North Preview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimisPackers" data-source="post: 375905" data-attributes="member: 4877"><p>My concern with your analysis is that it doesn't account for the mindset/structure of the leadership for each team-</p><p>So in order of coaching/talent/chemistry</p><p></p><p>My guess is:</p><p></p><p>1.Packers (12-4)</p><p>2. Lions (9-7)</p><p>3. Bears (9-7)</p><p>4. Vikings (7-9)</p><p></p><p>1.I don't think I need to discuss the coaching/leadership/talent of The Packers. Returning coach, QB, staff, core players, etc. The only way I see us struggling to stay ahead in the division is if we fail to establish a respectable running game.</p><p></p><p>2. Lions are plucking all the right chickens, but their coaching staff needs to become better at adjusting in-game schemes. Too many close loses and missed opportunities. Lessons learned but growing pains will follow them for another year, and a solid LB or two can push them to consistency.</p><p></p><p>3. Bears will still have a solid defense, returning coaching staff, but the inability of Lovie to rotate his veterans throughout the game/season (lack of depth?) Bites him in the booty when the playoffs start- too many nagging injuries. Fatigue injuries perhaps, but with defensive stars and a risk taking QB they should stay above the hot water at the bottom of the division. </p><p></p><p>4. I hate to admit that I like any Viking player but Peterson is a hog. I like Percy and a few other no-namers but I don't see this team cohesive enough to put together 16 games of good football. New (old) leadership may amp up the players- but chemistry is built not signed to a contract, so the QB deal hinders the teams ability to have that chemistry from the start (and the lockout sure didn't help any team with a new coach or rookies or new QB).</p><p></p><p>W-L guesses came from pure intuition. No peaking at the schedule.... Remember always aim low so you won't be disappointed.</p><p></p><p>Love Jimi.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimisPackers, post: 375905, member: 4877"] My concern with your analysis is that it doesn't account for the mindset/structure of the leadership for each team- So in order of coaching/talent/chemistry My guess is: 1.Packers (12-4) 2. Lions (9-7) 3. Bears (9-7) 4. Vikings (7-9) 1.I don't think I need to discuss the coaching/leadership/talent of The Packers. Returning coach, QB, staff, core players, etc. The only way I see us struggling to stay ahead in the division is if we fail to establish a respectable running game. 2. Lions are plucking all the right chickens, but their coaching staff needs to become better at adjusting in-game schemes. Too many close loses and missed opportunities. Lessons learned but growing pains will follow them for another year, and a solid LB or two can push them to consistency. 3. Bears will still have a solid defense, returning coaching staff, but the inability of Lovie to rotate his veterans throughout the game/season (lack of depth?) Bites him in the booty when the playoffs start- too many nagging injuries. Fatigue injuries perhaps, but with defensive stars and a risk taking QB they should stay above the hot water at the bottom of the division. 4. I hate to admit that I like any Viking player but Peterson is a hog. I like Percy and a few other no-namers but I don't see this team cohesive enough to put together 16 games of good football. New (old) leadership may amp up the players- but chemistry is built not signed to a contract, so the QB deal hinders the teams ability to have that chemistry from the start (and the lockout sure didn't help any team with a new coach or rookies or new QB). W-L guesses came from pure intuition. No peaking at the schedule.... Remember always aim low so you won't be disappointed. Love Jimi. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
RepStar15
AKCheese
Latest posts
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Dantés
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: PikeBadger
16 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
57 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
Today at 9:37 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Packer Articles
Packer Articles
NFC North Preview
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top