Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Packer Articles
Packer Articles
NFC North Preview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimisPackers" data-source="post: 375905" data-attributes="member: 4877"><p>My concern with your analysis is that it doesn't account for the mindset/structure of the leadership for each team-</p><p>So in order of coaching/talent/chemistry</p><p></p><p>My guess is:</p><p></p><p>1.Packers (12-4)</p><p>2. Lions (9-7)</p><p>3. Bears (9-7)</p><p>4. Vikings (7-9)</p><p></p><p>1.I don't think I need to discuss the coaching/leadership/talent of The Packers. Returning coach, QB, staff, core players, etc. The only way I see us struggling to stay ahead in the division is if we fail to establish a respectable running game.</p><p></p><p>2. Lions are plucking all the right chickens, but their coaching staff needs to become better at adjusting in-game schemes. Too many close loses and missed opportunities. Lessons learned but growing pains will follow them for another year, and a solid LB or two can push them to consistency.</p><p></p><p>3. Bears will still have a solid defense, returning coaching staff, but the inability of Lovie to rotate his veterans throughout the game/season (lack of depth?) Bites him in the booty when the playoffs start- too many nagging injuries. Fatigue injuries perhaps, but with defensive stars and a risk taking QB they should stay above the hot water at the bottom of the division. </p><p></p><p>4. I hate to admit that I like any Viking player but Peterson is a hog. I like Percy and a few other no-namers but I don't see this team cohesive enough to put together 16 games of good football. New (old) leadership may amp up the players- but chemistry is built not signed to a contract, so the QB deal hinders the teams ability to have that chemistry from the start (and the lockout sure didn't help any team with a new coach or rookies or new QB).</p><p></p><p>W-L guesses came from pure intuition. No peaking at the schedule.... Remember always aim low so you won't be disappointed.</p><p></p><p>Love Jimi.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimisPackers, post: 375905, member: 4877"] My concern with your analysis is that it doesn't account for the mindset/structure of the leadership for each team- So in order of coaching/talent/chemistry My guess is: 1.Packers (12-4) 2. Lions (9-7) 3. Bears (9-7) 4. Vikings (7-9) 1.I don't think I need to discuss the coaching/leadership/talent of The Packers. Returning coach, QB, staff, core players, etc. The only way I see us struggling to stay ahead in the division is if we fail to establish a respectable running game. 2. Lions are plucking all the right chickens, but their coaching staff needs to become better at adjusting in-game schemes. Too many close loses and missed opportunities. Lessons learned but growing pains will follow them for another year, and a solid LB or two can push them to consistency. 3. Bears will still have a solid defense, returning coaching staff, but the inability of Lovie to rotate his veterans throughout the game/season (lack of depth?) Bites him in the booty when the playoffs start- too many nagging injuries. Fatigue injuries perhaps, but with defensive stars and a risk taking QB they should stay above the hot water at the bottom of the division. 4. I hate to admit that I like any Viking player but Peterson is a hog. I like Percy and a few other no-namers but I don't see this team cohesive enough to put together 16 games of good football. New (old) leadership may amp up the players- but chemistry is built not signed to a contract, so the QB deal hinders the teams ability to have that chemistry from the start (and the lockout sure didn't help any team with a new coach or rookies or new QB). W-L guesses came from pure intuition. No peaking at the schedule.... Remember always aim low so you won't be disappointed. Love Jimi. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
GBkrzygrl
DABIGZ
tynimiller
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Curly Calhoun
16 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
46 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
48 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Packer Articles
Packer Articles
NFC North Preview
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
