Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Next Defensive Coordinator
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 747617" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I really would prefer to stick with a 3-4. We're pretty well geared up for such a scheme. If we MUST run a 4-3, we want to run a 4-3 UNDER, not over. 4-3 under is basically a 3-4/4-3 hybrid and more of our guys would just be drop-in replacements.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, I don't a wholesale scheme change is necessary. Our front 7 is pretty good a stopping the run this year. That won't change much unless we went to a pure 2-gapping scheme, which would be a mistake. The glaring problems are pass rush and cornerback.</p><p></p><p>You can run just about any coverage with any base scheme, so 4-3 vs 3-4 doesn't matter without better corners. </p><p></p><p>Ditto pass rush. We just don't have a really special edge rusher anymore. Perry is pretty good, Matthews on the downslope and approaching "above average." With no one demanding a double team at least "most of the time," opposing offenses just double the most appropriate per alignment and playcall, with the assumption that the other guys can handle the other rushers one on one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 747617, member: 4199"] I really would prefer to stick with a 3-4. We're pretty well geared up for such a scheme. If we MUST run a 4-3, we want to run a 4-3 UNDER, not over. 4-3 under is basically a 3-4/4-3 hybrid and more of our guys would just be drop-in replacements. At the end of the day, I don't a wholesale scheme change is necessary. Our front 7 is pretty good a stopping the run this year. That won't change much unless we went to a pure 2-gapping scheme, which would be a mistake. The glaring problems are pass rush and cornerback. You can run just about any coverage with any base scheme, so 4-3 vs 3-4 doesn't matter without better corners. Ditto pass rush. We just don't have a really special edge rusher anymore. Perry is pretty good, Matthews on the downslope and approaching "above average." With no one demanding a double team at least "most of the time," opposing offenses just double the most appropriate per alignment and playcall, with the assumption that the other guys can handle the other rushers one on one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
swhitset
weeds
Schultz
Packermudgeon
gopkrs
scheeler
tynimiller
Emur
Team Ronny
Half Empty
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
2 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Next Defensive Coordinator
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top