Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Murphy said he didn't want to affect negotiations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 467598" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="color: #141414"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I’m not sure what you mean by ‘how does it benefit Murphy?’. Neither taking the side of management nor labor (whether it’s the NFLPA or NFLRA) directly “benefits” Murphy. Also from Murphy’s point of view, whichever side he took could have been seen by him as acting in best interests of the Packers. For example, obviously the Packers contribute to the compensation of the refs, so if he saw their demands as being out of line, it would have been in the best long-term interests of the Packers to vigorously oppose such a deal. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #141414"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">The point I made in my above post is, like many others who are compulsory members of unions, Murphy may have disliked unions even while he was a member of the NFLPA. So his experience on management’s side the past two decades could have reinforced his point of view, rather than change it. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 467598, member: 4300"] [COLOR=#141414][FONT=Tahoma]I’m not sure what you mean by ‘how does it benefit Murphy?’. Neither taking the side of management nor labor (whether it’s the NFLPA or NFLRA) directly “benefits” Murphy. Also from Murphy’s point of view, whichever side he took could have been seen by him as acting in best interests of the Packers. For example, obviously the Packers contribute to the compensation of the refs, so if he saw their demands as being out of line, it would have been in the best long-term interests of the Packers to vigorously oppose such a deal. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#141414][FONT=Tahoma]The point I made in my above post is, like many others who are compulsory members of unions, Murphy may have disliked unions even while he was a member of the NFLPA. So his experience on management’s side the past two decades could have reinforced his point of view, rather than change it. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
PackerDNA
Pkrjones
DoURant
PackerinSD
Latest posts
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Dantés
27 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
Today at 2:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Murphy said he didn't want to affect negotiations
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top