Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Mock Offseason
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 828900" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>No You’re exactly right It’s a bit more than just a 4th. Such as likely a 4th + late rounder 6th/7th etc..).</p><p></p><p>That said, it is my belief a small move won’t work as well with the calculator. Keeping in mind in going from #10 to #12 if you’re moving back you already know who’s getting picked at #10.. so you’re really only facing 1 unknown before you pick right away again. However, Its more like 1.25-1.5 picks differential in my mind because it does still slightly reduce the pool of selections for our opponent, thereby narrowing our chance of the team directly in front of us picking someone we have no interest in.</p><p></p><p>Trading back two slots is especially a no brainer if you’re at #10 and there’s two guys you have valued equal (as in the flip of a coin).</p><p> I’d do it at #12 to #14 for a 4th and 6th in a heartbeat if my main guys on my board are gone. In particular if several remaining prospects have a trivial amount of disparity on my board it’s an easy decision.There’s other exceptions, like trading out of day 1 like we did in 2017. But we demanded more for moving backwards those 4 spots because we also lost a 5th year option.</p><p></p><p>I still believe trading back #12+#150 with the Redskins for #15+#76 should be completely on the table if we have 3 draft prospects left at #12 that we deem fairly equal.</p><p>Then being aggressive and using #76 and #44 package to pick inside day1 for a 3rd time.</p><p>E.g,</p><p>#15, #29, #30</p><p>..</p><p>#75</p><p>#114, #118</p><p>..</p><p>#185, #194</p><p>#226</p><p>Etc..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 828900, member: 10086"] No You’re exactly right It’s a bit more than just a 4th. Such as likely a 4th + late rounder 6th/7th etc..). That said, it is my belief a small move won’t work as well with the calculator. Keeping in mind in going from #10 to #12 if you’re moving back you already know who’s getting picked at #10.. so you’re really only facing 1 unknown before you pick right away again. However, Its more like 1.25-1.5 picks differential in my mind because it does still slightly reduce the pool of selections for our opponent, thereby narrowing our chance of the team directly in front of us picking someone we have no interest in. Trading back two slots is especially a no brainer if you’re at #10 and there’s two guys you have valued equal (as in the flip of a coin). I’d do it at #12 to #14 for a 4th and 6th in a heartbeat if my main guys on my board are gone. In particular if several remaining prospects have a trivial amount of disparity on my board it’s an easy decision.There’s other exceptions, like trading out of day 1 like we did in 2017. But we demanded more for moving backwards those 4 spots because we also lost a 5th year option. I still believe trading back #12+#150 with the Redskins for #15+#76 should be completely on the table if we have 3 draft prospects left at #12 that we deem fairly equal. Then being aggressive and using #76 and #44 package to pick inside day1 for a 3rd time. E.g, #15, #29, #30 .. #75 #114, #118 .. #185, #194 #226 Etc.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Mock Offseason
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
