Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 820302" data-attributes="member: 12283">Josh Jackson is a much better athlete than people think.He's on the bigger side as a corner: 6'0" 196 lbs are 70th and 65th% results respectively. So you interpret his testing results through the prism of being bigger than average.Forty: 4.56 (24th%)Vertical: 38" (77th%)Broad: 123" (68th%)Short Shuttle: 4.03 seconds (80th%)Three Cone: 6.86 seconds (62nd%)His forty is the only test of any significance that isn't above average. And it is still within the range of successful corners. He's very similar, athletically, to Marcus Peters. His Sparq score was in the 94th%. Where he fell short as a prospect was in his technique in man coverage. He clearly didn't get that cleaned up as a rookie. He might, or he might not from here on out. But if he fails, it won't be from want of athleticism.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 235 (members: 0, guests: 235)