Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 820271" data-attributes="member: 7261">I gave you an agree, because frankly, its nice to agree with you on something for a change.  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laugh:" title="Laugh    :laugh:" data-shortname=":laugh:" />Not sure I would call Jackson a complete reach, but I too wasn't that sold on him, especially when people were mocking him going in the first round.  I also agree with you that he appears to be a better candidate to play safety and take advantage of his supposed ball hawking skills, my fear there is he may be like HHCD and be a liability when it comes to tackling.Oh and yes, we desperately need King to get and stay healthy, but I hope the Packers aren't relying on that to happen.  Even if he does stay healthy, I'm not 100% sold that he has proven himself to be a solid CB in the NFL yet.</blockquote>

Total: 654 (members: 3, guests: 651)