Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 817996" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>I agree with all except we should still resign Wilkerson. It is unrealistic to expect a DL to be effective as a rookie. Clark was okay as a rookie, but really became a great player in year 3. The more fresh legs you can cycle through the DL the better they all play. Wilk may still be an impact player, but may need more time off to remain effective. I believe that is true for Daniel's as well. So it's a great situation to get a young stud DL to come off the bench the first year to toughen the body and buildendurance, but not be relied upon for 90% of snaps,</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 340 (members: 2, guests: 338)