Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
MIKE SHERMAN SHOULD BE...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="net" data-source="post: 27485" data-attributes="member: 200"><p>The thread starter is heavily invested in his point of view. He wants to see the coach gone at all costs, heavy emphasis on all costs.</p><p></p><p>His entire argument is really stupid, since Sherman signed a 6 million dollar extension this year.</p><p></p><p>Ted Thompson could not stand in front of the Packer brass and justify giving Sherman that money, plus having to spend millions more hiring another set of coaches.</p><p></p><p>Like it or not, Sherman is here through at least next season. It makes no fiscal sense in any other context. Thompson could have simply told him they would talk after the season and left it at that, saving the team millions and going out to find a new coach from scratch.(footnote: up to 13 head coaches might be fired this off-season. Are there 13 really good replacements? Are you kidding? Why would they go to Green Bay when they could go to a 'glam' city?)</p><p></p><p>Ted Thompson chose to re-hire Mike Sherman, so the entire argument about him being fired is off the wall. Pack66's fetish is a lot like any addiction: he just has to keep doing it until HE hits rock bottom.</p><p></p><p>Lets look at two coaches recently hired, Jim Mora, Jr. in Atlanta and Mike Nolan in San Fran. One has succeeded while the other has produced little.</p><p>Why? Dan Reeves left Mora with a ton of young talent. Mora is a solid coach but the main point is this: talent. Nolan, like Mora, also has an NFL coaching father(****-another 49'er coach), but his team is struggling.</p><p>Why? Talent. The 49'ers blew their salary cap and ash-canned most of their talent, and have drafted poorly.</p><p>It centers around talent acquisition. Pick up a copy of last week's Packer Plus and read Cliff Christl's commentary on playmakers. Right on the money. The Packes(and the 49'ers) don't have enough YOUNG playmakers.</p><p>THAT is the real reason the team is having trouble.</p><p></p><p>The season is over, from a post-season standpoint. But the foundation for the future is being put together.</p><p></p><p>Pack66 just might start a new therapy genre: the Packer fan so obsessed with firing Sherman that other analysis is impossible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="net, post: 27485, member: 200"] The thread starter is heavily invested in his point of view. He wants to see the coach gone at all costs, heavy emphasis on all costs. His entire argument is really stupid, since Sherman signed a 6 million dollar extension this year. Ted Thompson could not stand in front of the Packer brass and justify giving Sherman that money, plus having to spend millions more hiring another set of coaches. Like it or not, Sherman is here through at least next season. It makes no fiscal sense in any other context. Thompson could have simply told him they would talk after the season and left it at that, saving the team millions and going out to find a new coach from scratch.(footnote: up to 13 head coaches might be fired this off-season. Are there 13 really good replacements? Are you kidding? Why would they go to Green Bay when they could go to a 'glam' city?) Ted Thompson chose to re-hire Mike Sherman, so the entire argument about him being fired is off the wall. Pack66's fetish is a lot like any addiction: he just has to keep doing it until HE hits rock bottom. Lets look at two coaches recently hired, Jim Mora, Jr. in Atlanta and Mike Nolan in San Fran. One has succeeded while the other has produced little. Why? Dan Reeves left Mora with a ton of young talent. Mora is a solid coach but the main point is this: talent. Nolan, like Mora, also has an NFL coaching father(****-another 49'er coach), but his team is struggling. Why? Talent. The 49'ers blew their salary cap and ash-canned most of their talent, and have drafted poorly. It centers around talent acquisition. Pick up a copy of last week's Packer Plus and read Cliff Christl's commentary on playmakers. Right on the money. The Packes(and the 49'ers) don't have enough YOUNG playmakers. THAT is the real reason the team is having trouble. The season is over, from a post-season standpoint. But the foundation for the future is being put together. Pack66 just might start a new therapy genre: the Packer fan so obsessed with firing Sherman that other analysis is impossible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Capitol 8805
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:33 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
MIKE SHERMAN SHOULD BE...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
