Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Pennel suspended four games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 653544"><p>To borrow a phrase, I agree with most of what you said, and your conclusion appears to be correct.</p><p></p><p>The NFL's terminology is confusing and I find myself having to refresh my memory every time one of these events occurs. Here's a link to the relevant documents if anybody is interested:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.nflpa.com/active-players/drug-policies" target="_blank">https://www.nflpa.com/active-players/drug-policies</a></p><p></p><p>The recreational drug policy is poorly titled "Policy and Program on Substances of Abuse", as if to suggest that performance enhancing drugs are not subject to abuse. I have to remind myself that when a reporter refers to the "substance abuse policy" he's not talking about performance enhancing substances.</p><p></p><p>As you said, alcohol above a specified blood level is included under this policy only if the guy has tested positive for something else and is in the remediation program. Interestingly, the list does not include psychedelics such as LSD.</p><p></p><p>So, a guy not in the remediation program could show up to the offseason test drunk on his *** or tripping his brains out and pass with flying colors.</p><p></p><p>2. The performance enhancing drug policy is clearly titled "Policy on Performance Enhancing Substances". You described it as a policy on "anabolic steroids and related substances", which is understandable since the NFLPA's own link uses that incorrect wording.</p><p></p><p>This policy also covers a raft of stimulants which are unrelated to steroids or their masking agents.</p><p></p><p>On an unrelated matter, 10 players from every team every week during the season are randomly tested for performance enhancing drugs, and the penalties for failing a test are stricter than for the recreational drugs. The league cares much more about "competitive integrity" and I can't say there's anything wrong with that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 653544"] To borrow a phrase, I agree with most of what you said, and your conclusion appears to be correct. The NFL's terminology is confusing and I find myself having to refresh my memory every time one of these events occurs. Here's a link to the relevant documents if anybody is interested: [URL]https://www.nflpa.com/active-players/drug-policies[/URL] The recreational drug policy is poorly titled "Policy and Program on Substances of Abuse", as if to suggest that performance enhancing drugs are not subject to abuse. I have to remind myself that when a reporter refers to the "substance abuse policy" he's not talking about performance enhancing substances. As you said, alcohol above a specified blood level is included under this policy only if the guy has tested positive for something else and is in the remediation program. Interestingly, the list does not include psychedelics such as LSD. So, a guy not in the remediation program could show up to the offseason test drunk on his *** or tripping his brains out and pass with flying colors. 2. The performance enhancing drug policy is clearly titled "Policy on Performance Enhancing Substances". You described it as a policy on "anabolic steroids and related substances", which is understandable since the NFLPA's own link uses that incorrect wording. This policy also covers a raft of stimulants which are unrelated to steroids or their masking agents. On an unrelated matter, 10 players from every team every week during the season are randomly tested for performance enhancing drugs, and the penalties for failing a test are stricter than for the recreational drugs. The league cares much more about "competitive integrity" and I can't say there's anything wrong with that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: lambeaulambo
Yesterday at 9:12 PM
NFL Discussions
Post Draft/UDFA/Off-Season Signings - Each Position Trade Block
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 8:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Prospects Deciding NOT to declare...
Latest: scheeler
Yesterday at 7:20 PM
Draft Talk
Is it time?
Latest: Sanguine camper
Yesterday at 7:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Pennel suspended four games
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
