Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Neal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Luca" data-source="post: 540845" data-attributes="member: 9032"><p>- Perry has been decent rushing from the right side, but somehow he is ineffective from the left side:</p><p>Right side: 55 pr snaps, 4 sacks, 11 "pressures" ; Left side: 139 pr snaps, 0 sacks, 14 "pressures" (stats are from PFF, they don't use half sacks)</p><p>- Neal on the other hand has been kind of "effective" rushing from both sides: </p><p>Right side: 89 pr snaps, 2 sacks, 9 "pressures" ; Left side: 290 pr snaps, 3 sacks, 37 "pressures"</p><p></p><p>Actually Perry's pass rush stats aren't that bad, his cover stats are very ugly though. He is probably the worst cover linebacker in the league (he gave up 2,43 yards per cover snap, by far the most among linebackers. Neal gave up "only" 1,12 yards per cover snap, which also ranks near the bottom). So the problem with Perry is that he is a one-trick-pony. He does have value as a pass-rushing specialist, but not as 3-down linebacker. Neal is definitely not an complete linebacker, but he is better in coverage and a better tackler than Perry. </p><p></p><p>I short, think keeping Neal would be a smart move if the price is right. I would however not be surprised if a 4-3 team picks him up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Luca, post: 540845, member: 9032"] - Perry has been decent rushing from the right side, but somehow he is ineffective from the left side: Right side: 55 pr snaps, 4 sacks, 11 "pressures" ; Left side: 139 pr snaps, 0 sacks, 14 "pressures" (stats are from PFF, they don't use half sacks) - Neal on the other hand has been kind of "effective" rushing from both sides: Right side: 89 pr snaps, 2 sacks, 9 "pressures" ; Left side: 290 pr snaps, 3 sacks, 37 "pressures" Actually Perry's pass rush stats aren't that bad, his cover stats are very ugly though. He is probably the worst cover linebacker in the league (he gave up 2,43 yards per cover snap, by far the most among linebackers. Neal gave up "only" 1,12 yards per cover snap, which also ranks near the bottom). So the problem with Perry is that he is a one-trick-pony. He does have value as a pass-rushing specialist, but not as 3-down linebacker. Neal is definitely not an complete linebacker, but he is better in coverage and a better tackler than Perry. I short, think keeping Neal would be a smart move if the price is right. I would however not be surprised if a 4-3 team picks him up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
rmontro
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Neal
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top