Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Neal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Packerlifer" data-source="post: 539653" data-attributes="member: 1242"><p>Neal (and Perry) are square pegs the Packers have been trying to fit into round holes. They are undersized defensive ends they're trying to make into 3-4 outside linebackers; because it worked with Clay Matthews and they haven't been able to come up with a true 3-4 olb since the shift to the defense in 2009.</p><p> </p><p> They once tried to convert a Pro Bowl 4-3 end Aaron Kampman into a 3-4 olb. </p><p> </p><p> If they have a future as 3-4 lb's it should be on the inside, where their size and power would be most effective and their liabilities in space wouldn't be as exposed. They could also be used as rush ends in subpackages.</p><p> </p><p> Of course, they are both injury prone.</p><p> </p><p> Time is running out on the experiment with both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Packerlifer, post: 539653, member: 1242"] Neal (and Perry) are square pegs the Packers have been trying to fit into round holes. They are undersized defensive ends they're trying to make into 3-4 outside linebackers; because it worked with Clay Matthews and they haven't been able to come up with a true 3-4 olb since the shift to the defense in 2009. They once tried to convert a Pro Bowl 4-3 end Aaron Kampman into a 3-4 olb. If they have a future as 3-4 lb's it should be on the inside, where their size and power would be most effective and their liabilities in space wouldn't be as exposed. They could also be used as rush ends in subpackages. Of course, they are both injury prone. Time is running out on the experiment with both. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
19 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: milani
Today at 2:09 PM
Introduce Yourself
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: milani
Today at 2:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 1:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Neal
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top