Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 978073" data-attributes="member: 10086">We will likely be in that top 12 area. If there isn’t as dominant WR or OT left that worth that high pick, I’d trade back about 5-10 spots and go after one in the late teens. In doing so we could pick up a 2nd rounder in the process. That would give us a top 44 top 54, 76 etc.. to address other positions.I still feel like Watson can be that deep threat if he can just stay on the field. He’s nowhere near his potential and if he gets in semi sync with his QB he’s going to tear up the deep stuff. He should’ve beat Patrick Peterson Snap 1 and instead brought doubt upon himself with our Staff.If we are sticking with #12 Brian better start thinking about more polished players and sacrifice some long term ceiling. His FO (like most) get star eyed with Combine results which is fun, but it’s to time go after players who will be more polished College prospects rather than long term projects. Doubs was a good stab at that concept.</blockquote>

Total: 1,019 (members: 2, guests: 1,017)