Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Midseason Assessment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 976439" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Yes. They were gashed in the first half. Barry needs to put a complete game together against a playoff contender. 2 Quarters isn’t enough.</p><p></p><p>How would you know? By the 12 snaps across 4 Quarters??</p><p>You’re defending a game plan that we already know didn’t work. We couldn’t have done any worse than miserable! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p>You said the same thing about Buffalo and how it was basically a bad idea to Run. You (and several others that jumped on your train) repeatedly used the Ravens as your litmus test if you recall?</p><p> So let’s just look at the evidence and the Ravens absolutely were admittedly successful, so I can see where maybe fear got you a little, which it does to each of us.</p><p></p><p>Ravens vs Bills 33X162 4.9 per</p><p>Packers vs Bills 31X208 6.7 per</p><p></p><p>Why not at least Run a bigger mix? 31 was Decent. We can handle </p><p>30-35 easily. It’s clearly worked in the games where we’ve committed (>25 rushes) It’s really probably the strength of this current Offense. I’m not suggesting doing it 100%, but Run Increased mix in situational, against teams with potent Offenses etc..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 976439, member: 10086"] Yes. They were gashed in the first half. Barry needs to put a complete game together against a playoff contender. 2 Quarters isn’t enough. How would you know? By the 12 snaps across 4 Quarters?? You’re defending a game plan that we already know didn’t work. We couldn’t have done any worse than miserable! :eek: You said the same thing about Buffalo and how it was basically a bad idea to Run. You (and several others that jumped on your train) repeatedly used the Ravens as your litmus test if you recall? So let’s just look at the evidence and the Ravens absolutely were admittedly successful, so I can see where maybe fear got you a little, which it does to each of us. Ravens vs Bills 33X162 4.9 per Packers vs Bills 31X208 6.7 per Why not at least Run a bigger mix? 31 was Decent. We can handle 30-35 easily. It’s clearly worked in the games where we’ve committed (>25 rushes) It’s really probably the strength of this current Offense. I’m not suggesting doing it 100%, but Run Increased mix in situational, against teams with potent Offenses etc.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Matt39
edensmage
Green_Bay_Packers
Firethorn1001
gopkrs
RRyder
RicFlairoftheNFL
Calebs Revenge
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
11 minutes ago
Draft Talk
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Poppa San
38 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: DoURant
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 10:39 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Midseason Assessment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top