Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Matt Miller's Post-Combine 7 Round Mock - Thoughts/Reactions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 712488" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>I haven't heard of any of those guys but I gotta say I loved your post. Much better than just a "this pick sucks" type of reaction and you give your thoughts on who you would rather have. </p><p></p><p>I admit that from a need standpoint it doesn't really fit but as we all know Ted will be the first to tell you he doesn't draft for need. As fans we sometimes have a difficult time seeing this. Most mock drafts are made from a need standpoint and this one seems to buck that trend.</p><p></p><p>If this were to end up being Teds draft I would have to agree with many of you who said they would be disappointed that more pressing needs were not addressed but I couldn't make any judgement based on these players at all. If this was our draft and 4 of these players ended up as pro bowlers for us I'd be very happy with it.</p><p></p><p>Let me just throw this out there for you though. Ted lets Lang walk, uses the money Lang would cost to sign a top FA Dback or pass rusher (our two biggest needs?) drafts Lamp as an instant Lang replacement. Now it wouldn't be so bad. Of course more likely it will happen that Ted lets lang walk, signs the 15th rated dback or pass rusher and drafts a WR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 712488, member: 10247"] I haven't heard of any of those guys but I gotta say I loved your post. Much better than just a "this pick sucks" type of reaction and you give your thoughts on who you would rather have. I admit that from a need standpoint it doesn't really fit but as we all know Ted will be the first to tell you he doesn't draft for need. As fans we sometimes have a difficult time seeing this. Most mock drafts are made from a need standpoint and this one seems to buck that trend. If this were to end up being Teds draft I would have to agree with many of you who said they would be disappointed that more pressing needs were not addressed but I couldn't make any judgement based on these players at all. If this was our draft and 4 of these players ended up as pro bowlers for us I'd be very happy with it. Let me just throw this out there for you though. Ted lets Lang walk, uses the money Lang would cost to sign a top FA Dback or pass rusher (our two biggest needs?) drafts Lamp as an instant Lang replacement. Now it wouldn't be so bad. Of course more likely it will happen that Ted lets lang walk, signs the 15th rated dback or pass rusher and drafts a WR. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Today at 2:03 AM
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Matt Miller's Post-Combine 7 Round Mock - Thoughts/Reactions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top