Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 896440">MVS ranks eighth among receivers drafted after the top 100 in receptions and fourth in yards.While Funchess wouldn't have been an ideal #2 receiver he would have made me feel more comfortable about the talent level at the position.First of all I was talking about receptions and not targets. In addition only 117 wide receivers were drafted from 2015 to '18. Among those MVS is ranked 30th in receptions, 22nd in yards, fifth in yards per reception and 76th in catch percentage. While that might account for something better than decent you shouldn't focus on the word I used to describe him but concentrate you my main point which is that he shouldn't be the #2 receiver on a Super Bowl contender.Nobody has mentioned anything about MVS being worthless. You're just making that up.If you don't agree with me categorizing MVS as a decent receiver who should I compare him to other than the best WRs being selected in the fifth round or later??? Otherwise it might be fair to call him decent.MVS had a great catch vs. the Bears and a terrible drop. Overall it wasn't a very good game as aside of the long TD reception he only had another catch.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 632 (members: 0, guests: 632)