Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 896186" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>I stated disagreement with him being the labeled #2, but perhaps you didn't read the whole comment.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Decent LOL. The dude was a Day 3 pick...since 2015 let's talk about how many WRs have been drafted...and look at more than just targets, look at yards, yards per reception, catch %, snaps, games active and such. Even the one stat you listed doesn't illustrate decent, it illustrates well above decent - especially when weighed to a 5th round pick. 48 out of 197 drafted guys. That is just 48th when discussing targets, no receptions, not yards, not yards per catch or yards per target or anything but one small blip and even for a bottom of the 5th WR to be in the top 25% over a 5 year window is way more than someone should logically expect - the crazy thing is if he bumps his catching percentage up just 5% the dude would leap a ton more in many categories given the type of targets he typically receives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 896186, member: 6578"] I stated disagreement with him being the labeled #2, but perhaps you didn't read the whole comment. Decent LOL. The dude was a Day 3 pick...since 2015 let's talk about how many WRs have been drafted...and look at more than just targets, look at yards, yards per reception, catch %, snaps, games active and such. Even the one stat you listed doesn't illustrate decent, it illustrates well above decent - especially when weighed to a 5th round pick. 48 out of 197 drafted guys. That is just 48th when discussing targets, no receptions, not yards, not yards per catch or yards per target or anything but one small blip and even for a bottom of the 5th WR to be in the top 25% over a 5 year window is way more than someone should logically expect - the crazy thing is if he bumps his catching percentage up just 5% the dude would leap a ton more in many categories given the type of targets he typically receives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top